Product
Industries
Resources
Engagement in the public sector is a different problem than in the private sector — and most vendor playbooks miss that. You cannot raise salaries, you cannot grant equity, and you operate under procurement rules that make a 9-month evaluation cycle normal. What you can do is harness mission, recognition, growth, and flexibility — the four levers that consistently show up in the top-quartile FEVS scores year after year. With roughly 30% of the federal workforce eligible to retire inside five years and 'Best Places to Work in the Federal Government' scores swinging 20+ points between agencies of the same size, the cost of getting this wrong is institutional memory walking out the door. This page is the playbook: who you're actually engaging, what the data says, and where engagement gets won or lost in a federal, state, or local agency.
Peer-reviewed research, government statistics, and industry studies — every number sourced, every source linked.
30%
Federal employees eligible to retire within 5 years
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2023 Federal Workforce Data
65.7
Government-wide FEVS Employee Engagement Index, 2023 (out of 100)
20+ pts
Gap between top- and bottom-ranked federal agencies on Best Places to Work
Partnership for Public Service, Best Places to Work in the Federal Government 2023
$23.5K
Estimated cost to replace one federal employee (training + recruitment + lost productivity)
Partnership for Public Service, 2022 cost-of-turnover analysis
11.4%
Federal voluntary attrition (quits + transfers) FY 2023
6.9%
Local government quit rate, 2023 — highest since BLS began tracking the sector
Each persona has a different shift, a different device, a different reason to care. The plan has to fit the role.
Mission-driven, often 15+ years in the agency, deeply skeptical of every 'engagement initiative' they've sat through. They will tell you the truth in a stay interview — if you actually ask.
Pain points
Closest to constituents, often the most under-resourced. Engagement has to compete with the private-sector pay premium that widened to ~15% in 2023 (BLS ECEC).
Pain points
The cohort the government most needs to retain — and the one most likely to leave. First-year attrition for new federal hires runs notably higher than mid-career.
Pain points
OPM data shows roughly 30% of federal employees are eligible to retire within five years, concentrated in technical and leadership roles. Some agencies (Treasury, Interior, SSA) face 40%+ exposure. Engagement work that doesn't double as institutional-knowledge transfer is solving the wrong half of the problem.
GS scale puts a hard ceiling on pay. The Partnership for Public Service's 'Best Places to Work' data shows mission alignment, leadership trust, and recognition consistently outweigh pay in stated reasons engaged federal employees stay. That's the lever — but it requires programs that take mission seriously, not generic engagement software.
FEVS is the gold-standard instrument and the basis for Best Places to Work rankings. But a once-a-year score, briefed three months after fielding, cannot drive in-quarter action. Top-quartile agencies pair the annual census with quarterly pulse surveys at the work-unit level — and act on results within two weeks.
FedRAMP Moderate (minimum), StateRAMP for state contracts, ATO authorization, GSA Schedule contracting paths, and Section 508 accessibility add real time and cost to any software acquisition. Engagement programs that wait for the perfect platform never launch. The ones that work pair process changes that need no procurement with software that's already authorized.
No corporate-email assumptions. No desk-job-only flows. These are the moments Actify actually shows up.
Use case · 01
The largest predictor of next-year FEVS scores is whether this year's results triggered visible action at the work-unit level inside 60 days. Agencies that publish a 'you said / we did' summary to each work unit see scores move; agencies that brief only at the SES level do not.
A regional EPA office sees its 'My supervisor listens to what I have to say' item drop 8 points. The branch chief publishes three concrete changes (revised 1:1 cadence, shifted decision authority on travel, new feedback channel) within six weeks. Next year's score recovers.
In practice
Use case · 02
Federal monetary awards are heavily constrained (5 U.S.C. § 4503). Peer-to-peer non-monetary recognition — visible, frequent, mission-tied — fills the gap and is what FEVS shows engaged employees actually value most.
A USDA field office launches peer recognition tied to mission moments (a successful inspection, a complex case closed). 9 months later, the agency-level FEVS recognition item moves +6 points with zero net new spend on award budget.
In practice
Use case · 03
A structured 30-minute conversation between a supervisor and a retirement-eligible employee, twice a year, focused on what would extend their tenure and what knowledge transfer they want to leave behind. Pairs engagement with succession.
A GS-14 IT specialist tells her supervisor she would stay another two years if her travel was capped at 25% and she could mentor two junior staff formally. The supervisor approves both within a month. Two years of institutional knowledge stays.
In practice
Use case · 04
Sanitation crews, 911 dispatchers, building inspectors, transit operators — frontline public-sector workers are often invisible to HR systems built around City Hall desk staff. Mobile-first recognition reaches them without requiring a corporate email or desktop login.
A county Department of Public Works rolls out phone-based peer recognition for road crews. Daily recognition volume jumps 15x in the first month — because the tool finally fits how those crews actually work.
In practice
Use case · 05
Three questions, 90 seconds, work-unit anonymized. Used to catch problems that the annual census misses by 9 months. The instrument complements FEVS — it does not replace it.
Between FEVS cycles, a Treasury bureau runs a quarterly 3-question pulse on workload and supervisor support. A division's workload score drops sharply in Q2; the deputy reassigns work before turnover spikes. Q4 FEVS shows the recovery.
In practice
Use case · 06
Continuing resolutions, lapses in appropriations, OMB directives, election transitions — federal and state employees absorb policy shocks that private-sector workers don't. Clear, fast, mission-tied comms during these moments is one of the strongest predictors of mid-cycle engagement.
During a 16-day shutdown, an agency CIO sends a daily 2-paragraph update — what's known, what's not, what's next — to all staff via mobile push. Post-shutdown FEVS leadership scores hold; peer agencies that went silent see leadership trust drop.
In practice
Authorization documentation, SSP, and POA&Ms available for agency ATO. Designed to live on FedRAMP Moderate infrastructure from day one.
VPAT 2.4 conformance documentation. Screen-reader compatible, keyboard navigable, color-contrast compliant. Required, not optional.
Question banks aligned to FEVS Employee Engagement Index and Global Satisfaction subscales — so pulse trends are interpretable alongside the annual census.
Aggregation thresholds (typically n≥5) protect small field offices and shift teams from being identifiable. Same rules OPM applies to FEVS.
Non-monetary peer recognition works within 5 U.S.C. § 4503 award constraints. Optional monetary award workflows route to existing agency processes — not around them.
Field staff, inspectors, dispatchers, sanitation, transit — works on personal phones with no MDM requirement. SMS fallback for staff without smartphones.
Evidence
20+ point Best Places to Work gap
Top vs bottom quartile result — peer-reviewed.
Federal agencies in the top FEVS quartile keep talent 2–3x longer than those in the bottom quartile — at the same pay scale.
The Partnership for Public Service's annual 'Best Places to Work in the Federal Government' rankings, derived from FEVS, show 20+ point engagement gaps between top- and bottom-ranked agencies of comparable size and mission. NASA, FDIC, and the Government Accountability Office consistently rank at the top; several other agencies stay near the bottom year after year. The variable is not pay — the GS scale is identical. It's leadership behavior at the work-unit level: how supervisors recognize work, how leaders close the loop on FEVS results, and whether mission alignment is reinforced in daily decisions. Engagement in government is a leadership-practice problem, and the agencies that treat it that way move scores. The ones that treat it as a survey instrument do not.
Buyer's guide for selecting software. Practitioner deep dives on retention, recognition, surveys, and internal comms.
Twenty-minute walkthrough built around your workforce — shift patterns, devices, integrations. Not a generic demo.
